|
HR Insights
The Lure
of the U.S. Technology Job
Economic
Benefits of the U.S. Offer Greater Incentive
OTTAWA (Feb. 9, 1999) –
Today’s technology worker enjoys at least 18% more disposable income by taking a job in the
United States, rather than staying in Canada according to a new report by PERSONNEL SYSTEMS.
Comparing disposable income in
5 major American high tech centres (Boston, San Jose, Austin, Seattle and Raleigh) to
Canada’s major high tech cities (Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, and Montreal) the
report shows that today’s high tech worker is economically better off in the U.S.
The differences in disposable
income (salary less major expenses) for a high tech worker in Canada and one in the United
States are significantly affected by the costs of housing, health care, transportation,
consumables and the country’s tax systems. The largest contributor to these differentials
is the difference between the tax systems, followed by housing costs and consumables.
Among the findings:
- U.S. salaries are pulling
ahead for hot demand jobs including Software Developers, Hardware Engineers, and Systems
Analysts.
- Workers (single, renting) in
Canada earning $50K retain 22% of earnings as disposable income. In the U.S., the same
worker has 38%. At the same earning level, married homeowners in the U.S. retain 18% in
disposable income. In Canada, the married homeowner cannot support the same standard of
living on that income, and has to reduce discretionary expenses to compensate.
- Single Canadians pay between
29% and 32% of their salary in income tax. At the same earning level, single U.S. workers
in Seattle and Austin pay 18% in income taxes, and 25% in the other cities surveyed
- Canadians filing as married
reduce their tax bill by an average of 3%; in the U.S. cities surveyed, the tax burden
eases by 7% to 10% for married workers.
" Consider a Software
Developer in Vancouver relocating to Seattle," suggests Robert
Hodgson, Senior Partner with Personnel Systems, "Paid a comparable salary (now earned
in $U.S.), the worker’s income tax burden drops from 27% of earnings to 10%. After covering
transportation, housing and health care costs, and purchasing a basic package of consumable
goods, living in Seattle yields 28% disposable income. Remaining in Vancouver, disposable
income would be negative. This economic advantage is what is contributing to the brain
drain."
The U.S. health care system and
higher crime rates are commonly cited by Canadians as reasons not to relocate to the United
States. However, these do not hold true for high tech workers. Health Care coverage in the
U.S., as in Canada, is typically provided as a benefit to high tech workers, and is 100%
employer paid. Crime rates within high tech centres in Canada are actually higher than in the
U.S., as high tech is represented in our major cities, including Toronto, Vancouver and
Ottawa, whereas in the U.S., high tech centres, like Austin, Raleigh, Boston, are not the
major urban centres known for high crime rates.
American companies aggressively
recruiting in Canada offer candidates significant relocation allowances, hefty signing
bonuses, and promises of greater opportunities for advancement. When considering a choice
between a job in Canada, or the U.S., today’s technology worker sees the economic advantage of
the U.S. position. Canadian employers, despite offering competitive salaries, will not be able
to attract and retain needed skills in the current labour shortage so long as working in the
U.S. continues to net a much greater financial advantage with lower taxes, and higher disposable
income.
The report used salaries from
PERSONNEL SYSTEMS’ Compensation Survey for the High Technology Industry, and 1999 economic
data from various public sources. Disposable income was chosen as the purchasing power index
providing the best measure of comparison between Canada and the U.S.. A detailed report is
available on PERSONNEL SYSTEMS’ web site at http://www.perssyst.com/survey/incomegap.htm
Back to top | Back to HR Insights
|